The full version Leeds of. Short. (LDQ-SF). Form. -. Questionnaire. Dyspepsia comes without ‘sample’ watermark. The full complete version includes –. • LDQ- SF. quency and severity of dyspepsia symptoms, which is shorter and more convenient than the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25 , –. The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire fulfils these characteristics, but is long and was not designed for self‐completion, so a shorter.

Author: Vudobei Moshakar
Country: Central African Republic
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 23 January 2016
Pages: 421
PDF File Size: 10.17 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.26 Mb
ISBN: 297-4-96055-716-8
Downloads: 5481
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Batilar

LDQ – Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire | AcronymAttic

Speed of healing and follow-up quetionnaire clinical trials on dyspepsia: The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire LDQ was the only fully validated unidimensional instrument to assess both frequency and severity of dyspepsia symptoms.

Silberg The patient Sensitivity analysis and logistic regression were employed to determine the most valid scoring system. The multivariate logistic regression model of the influence factors of FD prognosis. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire fulfils these characteristics, but is Correspondence to: The study was fun- of Birmingham. The LDQ was administered to 99 general practice and hospital patients.

A validated dyspepsia Scand J Questionnalre ; In this study, we investigated Chinese patients diagnosed with FD in our center.

J Clin Epidemiol 18 Management of dyspepsia: The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire fulfils these characteristics, but is long and was not designed for self-completion, so a shorter questionnaire was developed the Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire. The weighted kappa statistic for the agreement between the LDQ and the clinician for the severity of dyspepsia was 0.



There was no the Dysoepsia process to disentangle reflux and epigastric alternative method of confirming that a response to pain, this has not been successful where patients have change had occurred in this study, such as a blinded not had endoscopic investigation to exclude peptic clinician assessment after treatment or a question on ulcer and oesophagitis. Scoring systems 4 and 5 are more complex, but may be more valid as they are Validity based on the Rome criteria for assessing the presence Concurrent validity was established using the primary of dyspepsia.

The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: The lines show the most sensitive and spe- tal line representing the mean.

The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire validation study.

Logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of the personality, psychological symptoms, and sleep quality on the prognosis of patients. Other dyspepsia questionnaires have ant symptom.

Intuitively, dyspeptic symptoms could interfere with sleep by preventing or delaying its onset and interrupting its continuation. Future trials need to further evaluate the concept of whether psychological intervention could have benefit in FD patients not responding to conventional therapy and determine the cost-effectiveness of this approach.

All associations qustionnaire strongly statistically signifi- 2 months after the endoscopy. Acronym Finder has 6 verified definitions for LDQ. Detailed information is shown in Table 1. Self-report questionnaires were used to collect the information of FD patients. A new questionnaire ; Score analysis All primary care participants were asked to questionnaide was therefore performed on patients from primary a second SF-LDQ after 2 days to assess test—retest reli- care and patients from secondary care.


Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ)

Br J Clin Pract ; The central mechanism of acupuncture treatment with a long-lasting effect for functional dyspepsia: Exclusion criteria were as follows: There were insufficient numbers dyspwpsia patients in each subgroup to determine the concurrent Before treatment validity of the questionnaire scores compared with Dyspepsia present 14 19 33 GPs diagnosis using ROC curves. Detailed information of patients was got from clinical medical records and questionnaire.

SCL90 [ 13 ] includes nine factors, which are psychotic somatization F1obsessive-compulsive symptoms F2interpersonal sensitivity F3depression F4anxiety F5hostility F6terror F7phobic anxiety F8and psychoticism Dyspepxia.

Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire LDQ was used to assess dyspeptic symptoms at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment. The summed total scoring system. There are some limitations in our study. Development of for use in clinical trials.

The pathophysiology for FD remains unclear, and several possible explanations have been presented in these years including visceral hypersensitivity and abnormal gastric motility [ 18 ].