The Goos-Hanchen Shift. When describing total internal reflection of a plane wave, we developed expressions for the phase shift that occurs between the. Goos-Hänchen effect in microcavities. Microcavity modes created by non- specular reflections. This page is primarily motivated by our paper. these shifts as to the spatial and angular Goos-Hänchen (GH) and Imbert- Fedorov (IF) shifts. It turns out that all of these basic shifts can occur in a generic beam.

Author: Grojas Fenrigor
Country: Djibouti
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 6 April 2010
Pages: 90
PDF File Size: 1.89 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.32 Mb
ISBN: 974-9-58293-814-4
Downloads: 75655
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulkirisar

This means in particular that the internal dynamics of the ellipse should not display any traces of chaotic ray orbits. Contents 1 History 2 Theory 2. What better way to learn about science than televesion, right? Specular reflection with phase shifts artificially removed.

electromagnetism – The Goos Hanchen shift mechanism – Physics Stack Exchange

The vertex of the V must thus coincide with the center of curvature of the dome, which lies a small distance z 1 below the bottom mirror surface. In contrast to free-space experiments with incident and reflected beams, we can for example look for the resonance frequencies at which certain modes appear.

This is true not only for the ellipse, but even for the mundane rectangle. However, we did the calculations for a three-dimensional dome. BermanScholarpedia, 7 3: This page was last edited on 6 Octoberat As shown in the figure, the superposition of two plane waves with slightly different angles of incidence but with the same frequency or wavelength is given by.

So, given that the field penetrates some distance shigt the lower refractive index medium, the “effective” interface actually lies a small distance into gos-hanchen lower refractive index medium. The red lines forming an inverted V follow the corresponding specular-reflection path without the shift.

You can see this in the first movie, and in the image on the left: The expressions for the GHS given above diverge at the critical angle where the goos-hanchfn used in their derivation break down.

Compared to general ovals of identical eccentricity, it is typically a good approximation to consider the dielectric ellipse as non-chaotic, as can be seen on this page discussing dynamical eclipsing. This effect occurs because the reflections of a finite sized beam will interfere along a line transverse to the average propagation direction. As your mouse leaves the image, notice how the reflected beam moves over to the right, so the red reference line is no longer in the center of the beam.


As a result, reliable analytical formulas goos-ganchen the shift in the presence of curved interfaces have so far not been derived. This requires looking not just at single orbits but at their neighborhoods.

As in the optical case, the GHS can be related to the phase of the reflection coefficient of the corresponding plane wave problem.

Goos–Hänchen effect

WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance 75k 6 For comparison, two nearly plane water waves are shown in the movie on the right. Theories of a lateral shift in total internal reflection of electromagnetic waves were developed by Picht Picht J, and by Schaefer and Pich Schaefer and Pich, As with the ellipse, this dielectric mirror is partly penetrable. The phenomenon is actually wholly analogous to quantum tunnelling by a first quantised particle field described by e.

Scattering spectrum of an elliptical resonator mean radius R. An alternative explanation of the GHS can be given in terms of the time delay associated with the scattering of a radiation pulse at the interface.

Vectorial field calculations are important for this purpose because reflections at dielectric surfaces are polarization-dependent.

See examples for the circular dieletric on a separate page. An ellipse is a very particular type of oval: But unfortunately for Newton, corpuscles of light turned out not to be able to explain all optical phenomena.

When rays form families with well-defined caustics, one can often describe the wave solution succesfully using the WKB approximation or a generalization of it, the Einstein-Brillouin-Keller method. Many standard optical setups in particular when Gaussian beams are involved can be described fully by identifying one or a few rays, and decorating them with suitable wave patterns i.

This makes beams different from plane waves, which form wave fronts of infinite width. The reason why the shifg “Numb3rs” is unlikely to have a justifiable need for this effect is simply that the spatial shifts are of order of the wavelength of light i.


The Goos Hanchen shift mechanism Ask Question. There’s a more formal discussion of this phenomenon at Scholarpedia. Although it is also possible to make a convincing shifh for the existence of the effect in circular cavities shuftthere are some confusing questions that arise when generalizing to shapes like the ellipse.

The simplest illustration is the plane wave, which corresponds to an infinitely extended bundle of parallel rays. In the eikonal, the scattering phase can be incorporated as just one of several contributions to the phase that accumulates as the wave fronts evolve. This becomes even more important when the reflecting interface is not between a homogeneous dielectric and empty space.

Goos-Hänchen effect in microcavities

Views Read Edit View history. They compared total internal reflection from the back surface of a prism with the reflection from a silver strip that was deposited on the back of the prism. This effect is the linear polarization analog of the Imbert—Fedorov effect.

Although the interface between an elipse and the surrounding medium coincides with the coordinate lines of the elliptic cylinder coordinate systemthe wave field on the boundary cannot be assumed to have a constant value or constant derivatives, for that matter.

In such a seemingly pathological situation it’s especially interesting to ask what the relation between the ray and wave description of the system looks like. The shift is perpendicular to the direction of propagation, in the plane containing the incident and reflected beams. Both waves are reflected from the surface and undergo different phase shifts, which leads to a lateral shift of the finite beam.

One motivation came from an apparently boring test case that I originally only studied to validate my numerical computations of quasibound states: