Evaluating Professional Development (1-off Series) [Thomas R. Guskey] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a practical guide to. Evaluating Professional. Development. By. Thomas R. Guskey. University of Kentucky. (Article reprinted with permission from Dr. Guskey). Evaluating Professional Development has 27 ratings and 3 reviews. June said: A very user friendly book to guide evaluation efforts at the state and local.
|Published (Last):||4 December 2004|
|PDF File Size:||5.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.2 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
They need to gain specific knowledge and skills before we look to the organization for critical aspects of support or change. Again, planning backward makes this clearer.
Immediately following any professional development activity, I can gather information about levels one and two—finding out if people liked it and what they gained from that experience in terms of new knowledge and skills. A developmenh with Thomas R. John Harris rated it really liked it Nov 19, No trivia or quizzes yet.
Certainly something I will be referring to throughout the coming year. Increasingly, educators at all levels are coming to view professional development as a wvaluating and intentional endeavor that should be designed with specific goals in mind.
Amber Jones marked it as to-read Jan 28, Georgie rated it really liked it Jan 19, It was important for me ecaluating look at and reflect on the multitude of ways in which leaders need to evaluate their work.
Evaluating Professional Development
Why are levels four and five of your evaluation model—in which professional development is linked to student outcomes—so difficult to accomplish? After an introduction that examines why professional development and evaluation are so important, there are nine chapters: My thinking was influenced by profesisonal work of Donald Kirkpatrick, who developed a model for evaluating training programs in business and industry.
Katie Kelly added it Feb 28, Participants’ Learning”; 6 evaluatlng 3: Melinda marked it as to-read Jul 06, And if this is the case, funding may be withdrawn.
Below, he discusses his five-step process for evaluating professional development in education and its connection proressional professional development planning. All other decisions are then based on that fundamental premise. Each level provides different types of information that can be used in both formative and summative ways.
Evaluating Professional Development, according to Guskey ()
Are there more current research on evaluating professional development? Aug 24, Susan rated it liked it Shelves: They must ensure that research comes from reliable sources, specifically peer-reviewed journals. Thursday, Feb 19, Paniz Saadati marked it as to-read Sep 26, Jay Salikin is currently reading it Sep 29, But information on levels three, four, and five cannot be gathered at that time.
They must show that the program has been applied in a wide variety of contexts and that its effects evaluated by third parties. This isn’t because they are afraid of change. We also need to involve multiple stakeholders in the planning process to identify the sources of evidence that they believe provide the best and most valid representation dvaluating success.
Kimberly Tyson rated it really liked it Mar 09, Administrators rated national and state tests highly, while teachers trusted their own, more immediate sources of evidence. Martha Bogart added it Sep 02, Jonathan Chambers added it Jul 13, Thanks for telling us about the problem.
But most policymakers, legislators, and school leaders are not asking for ugskey proof.
Pam Taylor rated it really liked it Jul 08, Too often in the past, educators have planned professional development based on what’s new and what’s hot, rather than on what is known to work with students. Evaluating Professional Development Thomas R.
The five levels of evaluation breakdown is particularly helpful – level one – participant evaluatiny, level two – participant learning, level three – organizational support and change, level four – use of knowledge and skills and level five – student learning. Thank you for taking the time eevaluating put this together.
Evaluating Professional Development – Thomas R. Guskey – Google Books
Gina rated it really liked it Aug 10, Provessional primary reason is that getting information at those levels must be delayed. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Organization Support and Change”; 7 “Level 4: Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.