respondent was entitled to initiate and complete penalty proceedings under the APGST Act subsequent to its repeal and the introduction of AP VAT Act, over, it admitted liability only to the extent of 4% under entry 90 of the First Schedule to the AP VAT Act, The Assistant Commissioner (CT), LTU. Andhra Pradesh VAT – APVAT Guide. The purpose of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, is to provide for and consolidate the law.
|Published (Last):||11 April 2008|
|PDF File Size:||3.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for. This Court stayed the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Reckitt Benckiser India P.
Apvat act, 2005 – certain clarification on paddy and rice
Transocean Offshore, International v. Sign up Now Join CAclubindia. Kerala High Court Section 80 of the A. Andhra Pradesh High Court State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rak Ceramics India Private Limited v.
TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, U.
SECTION 4 (9) OF AP VAT ACT 2005, Value Added Tax – VAT-CST
Alternatively, you can log in using: Allahabad High Court 4. Sikkim High Court State Of Andhra Prad VAT Act have no jurisdiction to assess such a contract to value added xpvat under the provisions of the a. This Court has been called upon Paras and of Mandal Judgment. In State of Andhra Pradesh v.
Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0. We have heard learned Counsel for Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0.
P And Others… TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Himachal Pradesh High Court. Though the dealers are under the obligation to file all the requisite documents, they are taking the shelter of the 22005 instructions issued vide reference 2 nd cited and requesting to allow exemption by accepting any one of the document filed by them.
SECTION 4 (9) OF AP VAT ACT , Value Added Tax – VAT-CST
Viceroy Hotels Limited v. Uttarakhand High Court Bishambhar Nath Kohli v. However, it came to the notice of this Office that by misinterpreting the wpvat instructions, certain dealers are enjoying the benefit of exemption on the sales falling under sub section 3 of section 5 of CST Act’ 56 even after a gap of one year by offering to file any of the required documents, stated above.
Vellanki Frame Works v. Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for. Mgrm Medicare Limited v.
Before the AO, assessee furnished following documents to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
In Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Union of India and others Vs. Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property Can’t display summary as content is Scanned, Please open apvt judgment to see full content.
The High Court after considering several National Company Law Appellate Tribunal 2. Rice and 0205 Mills and others Etc. The Appellant is a Debts Recovery Tribunal Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The only grievance of Revenue relates to deleting the addition made on account of purchases made from five parties which were declared by Sales Tax Department as suspicion Please log in or register for a free trial to access these features.
Sanjeev Kumar Thakur, TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal zct.